PR D — the final pass of the post-review fix series. Bundles the
seven visual / UX polish items the design review flagged.
P1 + P5 — sidebar account strip (`src/components/layout/sidebar.tsx`)
- Owner used to be invisible in the role-chip slot (the previous
check was `accountRole && accountRole !== "owner"`), so owners
looked indistinguishable from admins. Now the chip always
renders, with a per-role icon + colour pulled from a new
`ROLE_CHIP` table.
- Added `title={account.name}` on the truncated name so the full
account name is visible on hover when it's clipped (long names
+ narrow sidebars).
P2 + P3 + P10 — members tab (`members-tab.tsx`)
- **P2** — destructive Remove / Revoke buttons used a neutral
default that only turned red on hover. The destructive intent
was invisible until the user moused over. Both buttons now have
a red default state (`border-red-500/40 bg-red-500/10
text-red-300`) with a darker shade on hover.
- **P3** — role chips were all slate. Replaced with a per-role
colour scale: owner amber (scarce, immutable), admin primary
(significant), agent slate (operational default), viewer muted
slate (read-only). Mirrors the sidebar's `ROLE_CHIP` table so
the two surfaces don't drift; once the surface stabilises this
should hoist into a shared module.
- **P10** — pending invitations section now opens with a one-line
hint: "The plaintext invite URL is only shown once at creation
for security — to re-share, revoke the invite below and create
a new one." Pre-fix, admins kept looking for a "copy link"
button on the pending rows; the design decision (don't store
plaintext) is now self-explanatory.
- Cleanup: removed the now-unused `ROLE_LABELS` constant
(subsumed by `ROLE_CHIP[role].label`).
P4 — amber "Save this link now" callout contrast
- Pre-fix: `bg-amber-500/10 + text-amber-200` on slate-900 was
borderline for WCAG AAA body-text contrast.
- Post-fix: `bg-amber-500/15`, border bumped to `/50`, strong
intro promoted to `amber-100` so the urgent copy reads with
proper weight against the dark backdrop.
P7 — Try-again button on join page server_error
- Pre-fix: the only recourse for a server_error peek was to
follow "Create a new account" / "Sign in" links — both lose
the invite token.
- Post-fix: extracted the peek+auth fetch as `loadPeekAndAuth`,
call it from a new "Try again" primary button on the
server_error card. Other failure reasons (not_found / used /
expired) are terminal for this token so they keep the
signup/sign-in escape hatches; only server_error gets retry.
Verification
- `npm run lint` → 0 errors (same 19 pre-existing warnings)
- `npm run typecheck` → clean
- `npm test` → 366/366 pass
- `npm run build` → succeeds
Closes out the post-review fix series. Combined with PRs A
(#178, backend perf), B (#179, UI blocking), and C (#180,
front-end correctness), every item from the consolidated review
report is addressed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .github | ||
| public | ||
| src | ||
| supabase/migrations | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .env.local.example | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .prettierignore | ||
| .prettierrc | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| CHANGELOG.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| components.json | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| eslint.config.mjs | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| next.config.ts | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| postcss.config.mjs | ||
| README.md | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
wacrm — CRM Template for WhatsApp
Self-hostable CRM template for WhatsApp® — shared inbox, contacts, sales pipelines, broadcasts, and no-code automations. Fork it, brand it, host it.
The marketing site and self-host docs live in a separate repo: ArnasDon/wacrm-site (wacrm.tech). This repo is the product — clone or fork it to run your own CRM.
What you get out of the box
- Shared inbox on the official WhatsApp Business API — multiple agents working one number, per-conversation assignment, status, and notes.
- Contacts + tags + custom fields, CSV import, deduplication.
- Sales pipelines (Kanban) with deals linked to conversations.
- Broadcasts with Meta-approved templates, delivery + read tracking, per-recipient variable substitution.
- No-code automations — triggers on inbound messages, new contacts, keywords, or schedule; conditional branches, waits, tags, webhooks. Visual builder.
- Real-time dashboard — response times, daily volume, pipeline value, cross-module activity feed.
- Account management — email, password, avatar, global sign-out.
Why fork this?
This is a template, not a product. Forking means you get:
- Full ownership — your code, your Supabase project, your domain, your data. No SaaS lock-in, no seat pricing, no trust dance.
- Full customisation — add the fields your team needs, remove the modules you don't, redesign anything. The stack is boring on purpose (Next.js + Supabase + Tailwind) so the learning curve is short.
- Zero ops to start — Hostinger Managed Node.js deploys a fork in a few clicks. No Docker, no Kubernetes, no infra team needed.
- Real security primitives — token encryption (AES-256-GCM), RLS on every table, HMAC-verified webhooks, CSP, rate limiting, CI typecheck/build on every PR.
Not a framework. Not an SDK. A concrete, working CRM you can stand up in an afternoon and make yours.
Quick start
# Fork on GitHub first: https://github.com/ArnasDon/wacrm → Fork
git clone https://github.com/<your-username>/wacrm.git
cd wacrm
npm install
cp .env.local.example .env.local # fill in Supabase + Meta creds
npm run dev
Open http://localhost:3000. You'll be redirected to /login (or
/dashboard if already signed in).
Documentation
Full self-host documentation — Supabase migrations, WhatsApp Business API config, and production deploy — lives at wacrm.tech/docs (source: ArnasDon/wacrm-site).
Key pages:
- Getting started
- Supabase setup
- WhatsApp setup
- Environment variables
- Deploy on Hostinger
- Architecture
- Troubleshooting
Stack
- App — Next.js 16 (App Router), React 19, TypeScript, Tailwind v4.
- Data — Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Storage + RLS).
- WhatsApp — Meta Cloud API (official WhatsApp Business API).
Contributing
This is a template, not a collaborative product — the expected flow is
fork → customise → deploy, not upstream contribution. Bug reports
and security issues are welcome; feature PRs often belong in your fork
rather than here. Details in
CONTRIBUTING.md and
.github/SECURITY.md.
License
MIT. Fork it, brand it, host it.