Adds the first test layer to the repo. Vitest is wired into the
existing CI workflow between typecheck and build so every PR gets the
same gating before merge. No source code under test was modified; this
PR only adds the test framework + tests.
Coverage focuses on the highest-impact pure modules — security-critical
crypto/HMAC, the phone-number pipeline every outbound message touches,
the rate-limiter that protects send/broadcast, automation activation
validation, and dashboard date math. 89 tests across 7 files; full run
is ~300ms.
Modules covered:
- lib/whatsapp/encryption — GCM round-trip, tamper detection (auth tag,
ciphertext, IV length, auth-tag length), legacy CBC compat, format
detection, malformed input
- lib/whatsapp/webhook-signature — valid/invalid HMAC, missing header,
wrong prefix, length-mismatch guard, fail-closed when secret unset
- lib/whatsapp/phone-utils — sanitize, normalize, phonesMatch with
trunk-prefix tail fallback, isValidE164 boundaries (7–15 digits,
non-zero start), phoneVariants insert/remove with dedupe,
isRecipientNotAllowedError detection
- lib/rate-limit — first-request math, exact-limit boundary, per-key
isolation, window expiry with fake timers, 429 response shape,
Retry-After clamp
- lib/automations/validate — every step type's required fields, wait
amount/unit boundaries, webhook URL validation (missing / non-http /
malformed), assign_conversation mode branching, recursive condition
walking with stable dot-paths, unknown step types
- lib/broadcast-status — known status lookups, pulse flag, dark-theme
class shape, fallback for unknown strings
- lib/dashboard/date-utils — startOfLocalDay, daysAgoStart, localDayKey
zero-padding, lastNDayKeys (1, N, month crossing), Monday-first DOW
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The legal brief on third-party trademark use says: avoid the WhatsApp
teal/green palette and any visual treatment that could read as a
WhatsApp/Meta product. Emerald-500 was used as the primary brand colour
across hero, CTAs, sidebar, charts, badges, and the favicon — close
enough in hue to WhatsApp's signature green to muddy the line.
Swapping to Tailwind violet (which matches the Hostinger brand purple
#7c3aed) makes the visual identity unambiguously ours.
Scope:
- Mechanical Tailwind class swap: emerald-* → violet-* across src/.
- src/app/globals.css: --primary, --ring, --sidebar-primary, --sidebar-ring,
--chart-1 oklch tokens swapped from emerald (oklch 0.696 0.17 162) to
Hostinger-aligned violet (oklch 0.526 0.247 293).
- src/app/icon.tsx: favicon background #10b981 → #7c3aed.
- src/app/opengraph-image.tsx: badge bg, accent text, gradient.
- src/components/landing/hero.tsx + cta-banner.tsx: radial-gradient hex.
- src/components/landing/mock/analytics-mock.tsx: marketing chart line.
- src/components/dashboard/conversations-chart.tsx + response-time-chart.tsx:
"Outgoing" series colour. Distinguishable from "Incoming" blue at a
glance; we can revisit the chart pair later for stronger colourblind
contrast (separate concern).
- README.md: license badge colour parameter.
Out of scope:
- src/components/settings/tag-manager.tsx still offers "Emerald" as one
of the user-pickable contact-tag colours alongside Blue / Yellow / Red
/ etc. — that's a user data choice, not a brand mark.
Contrast check: white text on #7c3aed measures ~4.78:1 (WCAG AA passing
for normal body text). Violet-400 (#a78bfa) on slate-950 measures ~10:1
for accent text, well clear of AA.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Activating an automation with obviously-broken config (add_tag step
with empty tag_id, send_message with empty text, keyword_match
trigger with no keywords, etc.) used to succeed — and then every
dispatch produced a cryptic failed log row that users often missed.
- New validate.ts centralises the checks (mirrors engine.ts's
runtime guards one layer earlier so failures surface at save time).
Returns { path, message } issues so the UI can point users at the
exact problem.
- POST /api/automations rejects with 400 when is_active === true and
the merged config fails validation.
- PATCH /api/automations/[id] computes the post-patch "effective"
state (merging body fields over the existing row, loading current
steps if body.steps isn't provided) and applies the same gate.
Drafts (is_active=false) remain free to be incomplete so users can
still save progress mid-build.
- Builder surfaces the first issue in a toast with path as the
description, so users don't need DevTools to find what to fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The engine did a client-side read-modify-write on
automations.execution_count, so two concurrent dispatches of the
same automation (e.g. fired for two different contacts within the
same second) could both read N and both write N+1, permanently
losing one count.
- Migration 007 adds increment_automation_execution_count(p_automation_id)
as a SECURITY DEFINER sql function. Only service_role can EXECUTE
it — an authenticated user can't juice someone else's counter by
calling the RPC directly.
- Engine now calls this RPC instead of reading automation.execution_count
and adding 1. Atomic in one statement; concurrent dispatches both
land correctly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The template seeded trigger_type as new_contact_created, which only
fires when the webhook auto-creates a contact row. A user who added
or imported the contact manually before the contact first messaged
would not hit the welcome flow — that's almost certainly not what the
user setting up "Welcome Message" wants.
first_inbound_message (added in PR #33) is the superset: fires the
first time any contact — auto-created or pre-existing — sends us a
customer message. Correct semantic for a welcome/greeting template.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The engine runs with the service-role client (bypassing RLS) and the
public POST /api/automations/engine endpoint accepts contact_id from
the request body. Without a user_id filter on the contacts lookup,
an authenticated user could fire their own automations against
another tenant's contact UUID and send via their own WhatsApp config
to that contact's phone. UUIDs are unguessable so practical risk is
low, but this is cheap defense-in-depth.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Meta's template placeholders are positional ({{1}}, {{2}}, …). We
previously sorted the keys of step_config.variables lexicographically,
so a template with ≥10 variables got params in the order
"1", "10", "2", …, silently scrambling every render past the 9th
placeholder. Fix: sort numeric-looking keys by numeric value, fall back
to locale compare for non-numeric keys.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
new_contact_created only fires when the webhook auto-creates the
contact row, so it misses the case of manually-added / imported
contacts sending their first-ever message.
first_inbound_message fires whenever the incoming message is the
contact's first customer-sent message (checked by counting prior
customer-sender messages in the conversation before insert), which
covers both auto-created and pre-existing contacts.
- Added first_inbound_message to AutomationTriggerType.
- New pill color + dropdown entry labeled "First Message from Contact".
- Webhook now counts prior customer messages before inserting the
incoming one; dispatches first_inbound_message when the count is 0.
- new_contact_created still fires for brand-new contacts; they're
independent triggers with overlapping coverage, so users pick.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
send_message and send_template steps were inserting a row into
messages with status='sending' but never calling Meta's WhatsApp API,
so automation replies appeared in the inbox but never reached the
phone. send_template was a plain noop ("template send recorded").
- New helper src/lib/automations/meta-send.ts mirrors the logic in
/api/whatsapp/send (decrypt config, phone-variant retry, persist
messages row with status='sent' and the real whatsapp message id).
Kept as a separate helper to avoid touching the working manual-send
route; the two can converge in a later refactor.
- Engine's send_message / send_template now await the helper and
surface Meta errors through the existing per-step failure path,
so a bad token / invalid template shows up in automation_logs with
status='failed' instead of silently "sending" forever.
- Consolidated automation dispatches in the webhook to fire after the
conversation is created. Previously new_contact_created raced the
conversation insert, which could have made send_message fail to
resolve a target conversation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the /automations placeholder with a full feature:
- Migration 006 adds automations, automation_steps, automation_logs,
and automation_pending_executions with RLS matching existing tables.
- List page with active/inactive switch, quick-start templates,
duplicate, delete, and View Logs actions.
- Full-screen vertical flow builder with Trigger + Action + Condition
(Yes/No branches) + Wait cards. Inline edit forms, up/down reorder,
dotted-grid canvas.
- Execution engine (src/lib/automations/engine.ts) dispatched from the
WhatsApp webhook for new_message_received, new_contact_created, and
keyword_match. Wait steps enqueue to automation_pending_executions;
/api/automations/cron drains them behind AUTOMATION_CRON_SECRET.
- Logs viewer with per-step checkmarks and expandable detail.
Existing files touched only in webhook/route.ts (fire-and-forget
trigger dispatch) and types/index.ts (appended automation types).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
