Drops the "WaCRM" branded name across user-facing surfaces in favour
of a descriptive name. Branded names that imply WhatsApp ownership or
sponsorship are a trademark fair-use risk; a relationship-based name
("CRM Template for WhatsApp") sidesteps that.
Scope:
- Brand text in nav, sidebar, footer, docs shell, mock window chrome.
- SITE_NAME / SITE_DESCRIPTION / legalName in src/lib/seo/site-config.ts.
- README, CONTRIBUTING, docs/, .github/ templates and policies.
- package.json description.
- Auth pages, settings copy, FAQ, code comments.
Out of scope (intentionally — these are infra renames the project
owner should drive separately so links and the package lockfile stay
consistent):
- The github.com/ArnasDon/wacrm repo URL.
- The wacrm.tech domain / homepage field.
- The package.json "name" field.
- The Hostinger application name and Meta system-user name in deploy
docs (existing-deployment instructions).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
WaCRM is a template — users are expected to fork and customise their
own deployment, not to send feature work back upstream. The previous
CONTRIBUTING.md read like a standard collaborative-project onboarding
guide and set the wrong expectation.
Reframed docs:
- CONTRIBUTING.md is now "Using WaCRM". Opens with "fork it and make
it yours", covers forking + keeping-in-sync commands, explains
which PRs do tend to land (security, correctness, docs, small
nits) vs. which belong in a fork (new features, stack swaps,
opinionated refactors). Keeps the filename so GitHub's built-in
"Contributing guidelines" link still surfaces it.
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml: the intro block now
tells the forker up front that feature requests usually become
"build it in your fork", and describes the narrow cases where an
upstream request is useful.
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml: adds a third contact link
pointing at CONTRIBUTING.md so people see the fork-first framing
before filing.
- .github/pull_request_template.md: prepends a heads-up that most
changes belong in the forker's own repo, with a pointer to
CONTRIBUTING.md.
Nothing else in the PR changes — CoC, Dependabot, EditorConfig,
Prettier configs, issue bug_report.yml, and the package.json changes
are orthogonal to the fork-first framing and stay as-is.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nine paperwork files + one devDep. All support work for a repo that's
about to be public; zero runtime behaviour change.
- CONTRIBUTING.md at root. Dev loop, script reference, PR style, code
style, review process. Short on prose, long on specifics.
- .github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md adopts Contributor Covenant 2.1 by
reference (no inlined text). Points reports to the maintainer's
email and GitHub's private flow.
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ — structured YAML forms for bug and feature
reports, plus config.yml that disables blank issues and surfaces
the security-disclosure + docs links. The bug form asks for
version, runtime, and logs up front so triage doesn't start with
a round of "where is it running?".
- .github/pull_request_template.md — short checklist; nudges toward
typecheck / lint / build before submit without being long enough
to skip.
- .github/dependabot.yml — weekly npm + github-actions scans,
grouped so Supabase / @types / dev-only patches batch into single
PRs instead of six per week. Next / React / Tailwind / eslint-
config-next are ignored so majors stay manual.
- .editorconfig — LF, UTF-8, 2 spaces, final newline, strip trailing
whitespace (except in Markdown where trailing spaces are line
breaks).
- .prettierrc — single quotes + trailing-comma es5, matches the
plurality quote style in the codebase (336 single vs 236 double
in imports). Tailwind plugin sorts class names.
- .prettierignore — node_modules, build output, lockfile, migrations.
- package.json adds "format" / "format:check" scripts and pins
prettier + prettier-plugin-tailwindcss as devDeps.
- package-lock.json refreshed for the new devDeps.
Important: existing source files are NOT reformatted in this PR. 153
files would change if we ran `npm run format`, which would balloon
the diff and make review impossible. The reformat pass is a separate,
deliberate PR.
Typecheck clean; `npx prettier --check` on the new config files
passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
